I was thrilled to hear that my writer’s group loved Samuel
#6. But of course what that means is that they loved it in general. In specific
they had many comments and suggestions. The good part was that the comments and
suggestions were along the line that I had already figured needed to be done.
When you get critiques you have a few possibilities:
1) Everyone will love it and have nothing but glowing
comments. Dream on! Has this ever happened in the history of writer’s groups? I
can just hear Laura Lippman’s critique:
Jeez, Baltimore, Baltimore, Baltimore. Can’t you ever write about anything else? Or how about Michael
Connelly: Bosch is such a downer. I mean couldn’t the guy ever have a cheerful
moment? How about Rhys Bowen: Georgie, get a job, for heaven’s sake! Always
with the impoverished royalty bit.
I don’t care how brilliant a writer is, there are always
going to be people who want their writing to be different. You have to be on
the lookout for people who don’t like your voice, your topic, your setting, and
so on and not be swayed from your intentions.. A really good member of a
critique group will read a piece at face value, trying to put aside personal
prejudices and to help the writer improve based on what she is trying to
achieve.
2) Everyone will hate it and send you out the door and tell
you never to return. Admit it: that’s what most writers are afraid of. But just
like #1, that’s very unlikely. No one in the group may wholeheartedly like
everything about what you’ve written, but most people will find something that
appeals. One person may love the setting, another loves the plot, another the
voice. And sometimes you will get a reader who truly loves what you’ve done.
Yes, treasure that person, but remember, he isn’t the reader you will learn
from. You learn from the reader who gets what you are trying to achieve and who
gives you advice that will both support you and help you move toward your goal.
3) People will be divided down the middle. It used to drive
me crazy when half my writer’s group would love what I had written and half
would tear it to pieces. I didn’t want to ignore the critics, but I also didn’t
want to throw out what I had written. I knew deep down that there was some good
and some bad in my work, but how was I to know the difference?
The answer lies in listening carefully. Don’t just hear what
you are afraid a critic is saying. And don’t just hear what you hoped a reader
would appreciate. Listen to the actual words. Write down what people say. If
necessary, ask them to clarify. And then let the work sit for a day or two.
And then trust your instinct. You may not want to admit that
you knew all along that something needed another look, but you know deep down.
You have that, “darn it, I thought that would slip by” moment. If you let it
slip, you are doing yourself and the person who worked hard to help you a
disservice. That’s why you are in a writer’s group, after all.
1 comment:
Thanks, Terry, for your insightful post. The divided opinions hold true for the reviewers---sometimes I feel like I wrote two different stories with the same title and cover!
Post a Comment