In the many years when I was struggling to find a publisher,
I often heard the mantra “you have to believe in your work.” And it’s true—it’s
important that a writer take pride in her work like a parent takes pride in a child.
A new parent is pretty sure that her child is the best, brightest, strongest,
and most appealing in every way.
But at some point good parents recognize that a child may
need a little work. He’s a teenaged slob. She’s mean. He’s unable to look people
in the eye. She giggles too much.
Like a child, a manuscript may need a little work. So how does a
writer remain self-confident while not being so self-confident that he is blind
to the need of his manuscript to for judicious editing?
With a second set of eyes, that’s how. We’ve all known
parents who refused to see the tiniest flaw in their precious darlings. There
are numerous opportunities to get the information that little Billy or Lucy
needs a little guidance, but some parents ignore it—to the detriment of their
perfect monsters.
The same is true for an author. There are plenty of
opportunities to find out if the manuscript measures up. Writer’s groups, beta
readers, workshops, and paid editors can give an author the feedback he or she
needs. The job of the author is not just to find way to get the feedback, but
to use it constructively.
“Constructively” is the operative word. When you get
feedback there are several ways to receive it:
1)
Believe all of it and twist yourself into a
pretzel trying to incorporate each and every comment. Do this, and you’ll end
up not only with a hot mess, but also deflated confidence. In fact, it’s a mark
of low confidence to not be selective in using the edits that are suggested to
you.
2)
Believe none of it. What a disappointment for a
reader to put in the time and effort to give honest feedback, only to have the
author dismiss every suggestion out of hand. This is self-deception at its
worst.
3)
Weigh carefully the advice and figure out how it
fits into the feel of the story. This isn’t something that happens overnight.
When you first turn your manuscript over to people to critique, the first
response you often have is #1 or #2 above-that is, “my manuscript is total crap
and I’ve got to start over,” or “what idiots; the readers didn’t ‘get’ my
brilliant manuscript.” It’s important to give the critique time to percolate
and then remind yourself of what your goal was…and then figure out what changes
will work best. Don’t just look at which opinions are in the majority and
blindly follow them; instead, weigh them against what you want to accomplish.
The self-confident, "good" author knows that there’s always room for
improvement and will invite it and use it wisely.